Page 25 - MDJ Volume 47 Number 2 ( Jul-Dec 2024)

Khan, et al.: Soft tissue analysis of the chin, length and thickness of the upper lip

references 12. Mamandras AH. Growth of lips in two dimensions: A serial
cephalometric study. Am J Orthod 1984;86:61-6.
1. Zylinski CG, Nanda RS, Kapila S. Analysis of soft tissue facial 13. Stoner MM. Photometric analysis of facial profile–A method of
profile in white males. Am J Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics assessing facial change induced by orthodontic treatment. Am J
1992;101:514-8. Orthod 1955;41:453-69.
2. Matoula S, Pancherz H. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and 14. Blanchette ME, Nanda RS, Currier G, Ghosh J, Nanda SK. A
nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 2006;76:204-10. longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tissue profile of short-
3. Subtelny JDA. longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and and long-face syndromes from 7 to 17 years. Am J Orthod Dentofac
their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal Orthop 1996;109:116-31.
structures. Am J Orthod 1959;45:481-507. 15. Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the
4. Burstone CJ. The integumental profile. Am J Orthodontics facial soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod 1990;60:177-90.
1958;44:1-25. 16. Feres MFN, Hitos SF, Sousa HI, Matsumoto MAN. Comparison
5. Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod of soft tissue size between different facial patterns. Dental Press J
1969;55:585-99. Orthod 2010;15:84-93.
6. Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anterioposterior growth as related 17. Celikoglu M, Buyuk SK, Ekizer A, Sekerci AE, Sisman Y.
to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964;34:75-93. Assessment of the soft tissue thickness at the lower anterior face
7. Naini FB, Moss JP, Gill DS. The enigma of facial beauty: Esthetics, in adult patients with different skeletal vertical patterns using cone-
proportions, deformity, and controversy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2015;85:211-7.
Orthop 2006;130:277-82. 18. Macari AT, Hanna AE. Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in
8. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns. Angle
Am J Orthod 1967;53:262-84. Orthod 2014;84:708-14.
9. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and 19. Lai J, Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Effects of orthodontic therapy on the
treatment planning--Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop facial profile in long and short vertical facial patterns. Am J Orthod
1993;103:395-411. Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:505-13.
10. Ashraf K, Kulshrestha R, Azam A, Shabir S, Kaur H. Soft tissue 20. Jakobsone G, Stenvik A, Espeland L. Soft tissue response after Class
analysis of chin, upper lip length and thickness in patients with III bimaxillary surgery. Angle Orthod 2013;83:533-9.
different mandibular divergent patterns--A cephalometric study. 21. Mobarak KA, Krogstad O, Espeland L, Lyberg T. Factors
Indian J Orthod Dentofac Res 2018;4:88-93. influencing the predictability of soft tissue profile changes
11. Chaconas SJ, Bartroff JD. Prediction of normal soft tissue facial following mandibular setback surgery. Angle Orthod
changes. Angle Orthod 1975;45:12-25. 2001;71:216-27.

Malaysian Dental Journal ¦ Volume 47 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ July-December 2024 19